Dynamics of Humoral and Cellular Responses in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: The original SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regimen (2 doses) induces insufficient short-term response in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. This study assessed the response to a third dose and the long-term immunogenicity after 2 doses in KT. METHODS: We analyzed the dynamics of the humoral and cellular response by monitoring SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies against the Spike-protein (IgG-Spike) and QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 IFN-γ release assay 6 mo after the second dose (T2) and 28 d after the third dose of mRNA vaccines (T3) to KT and controls (dialysis patients and healthy individuals). RESULTS: At T2, the percentage of IgG-Spike+ KT and dialysis patients decreased (KT 65.8%-52.6%, hemodialysis 92.6-81.5%, and peritoneal dialysis 100%-90%), whereas 100% of healthy controls remained positive. About the cellular response, the percentage of responders decreased in all groups, especially in KT (22.4%-9.2%, P = 0.081). At T3, 92% of KT, 94%-98% of dialysis patients, and 100% of healthy controls were IgG-Spike+. In terms of antibody titers, patients and controls showed a reduction between T2 and T3 and about 80% of dialysis patients and 100% of controls achieved high titers after the third dose (>1479.5 Binding Antibody Units/mL), whereas this percentage was only 50% in KT. With respect to the cellular response, only KT displayed a significant rise after the third dose. CONCLUSIONS: The third dose of mRNA vaccine improves both humoral and cellular responses, but less effectively in KT compared with dialysis patients and healthy controls.

Impact of DE Novo Immunosuppression in The Covid-19 Serological Status at Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS COVID-19 infection has heavily impacted our national health system since March-2020. Although the kidney transplant (KT) activity was strongly reduced initially, nowadays it is partially recovered by using ‘COVID-clean’ pathways and vaccination of KT candidates since February-2021. However, scarce information is available regarding how de novo KT immunosuppression influences the serological status of vaccinated recipients. METHOD We reviewed the course of 38 de novo KT recipients transplanted between March-September 2021 fully vaccinated before KT. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies against Spike (IgG-S) before and after KT (median: 32 days) were quantified with a serological assay (positive ≥13.0 AU/mL). RESULTS Of 38 recipients, 35 showed positive IgG-S at KT (92%). We exclude from the analysis, 4 recipients with COVID infection which interfered the analysis and 5 with inappropriate samples. The remaining 26 recipients had received the second dose of the mRNA vaccine a median time of 48 days before the pre-KT IgG determination. All patients maintained IgG-S over the cut-off after KT, but we observed that half de novo recipients (53.8%) showed a 50% reduction in the level of IgG-S at 1 month: 12/20 (60%) of those who received induction with basiliximab and 2/6 (33%) who received thymoglobulin. Regarding the impact of maintenance immunosuppression under induction with basiliximab, the IgG-S levels halved in 50% of those with tacrolimus-mycophenolate and 67% with tacrolimus-everolimus. The restricted analysis of IgG-S levels excluding five outliers before KT (>800 AU/mL) showed the most intense reduction in three KT recipients who received thymoglobulin-tacrolimus- mycophenolate (263.8 versus 68.8, 74%) compared with seven basiliximab-tacrolimus-mycophenolate cases (494.4 versus 359.8, 27%) and eleven basiliximab-tacrolimus-everolimus (344.0 versus 306.4, 11%) KT recipients. CONCLUSION Immunosuppression in de novo KT recipients reduces significantly the seroprotective levels of antibodies anti-Spike induced by COVID m-RNA vaccines in more than half the recipients. In our experience, the combination of thymoglobulin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate produces a more intense reduction than the combination of basiliximab with tacrolimus and mycophenolate or everolimus.

Covid-19 Infection After Kidney Transplantation in Spain: Comparable Impact Throughout Six Epidemic Waves

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The successive COVID-19 epidemic waves have significantly influenced kidney transplantation (KT) programs. Contact protection together with vaccination are the principal protective tools for KT recipients. We reviewed the impact of COVID-19 infection in KT recipients throughout the different epidemic waves. METHOD Of 900 active KT recipients in our program, 160 (17.8%) have suffered COVID-19 infection during the six epidemic waves: first (March–August 2020), second (September–December2020), third (January–March 2021), fourth (April–May 2021), fifth (June–September 2021) and sixth (October–December 2021, preliminary data). We compared the clinical evolution and the impact of vaccination. RESULTS Infected KT recipients were younger in the third and fourth waves (P  < 0.001). We observed a higher percentage of pneumonia and hospital admission in the first and fifth waves (P = 0.045, P = 0.016) (Table 1), without differences in ICU admission, and with the disappearance of asymptomatic cases after the third wave. The highest mortality was observed in KT recipients >65 years old infected within the first 6 months after KT (P = 0.006) and overall mortality was higher in the first wave (P = 0.033). Mortality in hospitalized KT recipients and those admitted in the ICU were similar along the 5 waves, without clear impact of vaccination (P = 0.251). On the 5 January 2022, we have already accumulated an incidence of COVID in KT of 3.1% (sixth wave, 77% with booster vaccination), similar to the first wave (3.8%), with 12.5% mortality, similar to second, third and fifth waves, in patients with outcome (53.3%). CONCLUSION The incidence of COVID-19 in KT recipients has been high in all the waves of the pandemic in Spain. Global mortality has diminished after the first wave, and the time until outcome has increased. The highest mortality occurs in the subgroup of old KT recipients early after KT. Vaccination has not significantly reduced the mortality in KT with Covid who require hospital or ICU admission.

Manejo de la inmunosupresión en pacientes trasplantados de riñón con COVID19. Estudio multicéntrico nacional derivado del registro COVID de la S.E.N Management of immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients with COVID19. A multicentre national study derived form the S.E.N. COVID registry

Introducción: La infección por SARS CoV2 ha impactado de forma importante en los pacientes con trasplante renal causando una elevada mortalidad en los primeros meses de la pandemia. La reducción intencionada de la inmunosupresión se ha postulado como uno de los pilares en el manejo de la infección ante la falta de un tratamiento antiviral dirigido. Ésta se ha modificado de acuerdo con la situación clínica de los pacientes y su efecto sobre la función renal o los anticuerpos anti-HLA a medio plazo no ha sido evaluado. Objetivos: Evaluar los cambios de inmunosupresión realizados durante la infección por SARS-CoV2, así como la función renal y los anticuerpos anti-HLA de los pacientes trasplantados de riñón a los 6 meses del diagnóstico de COVID19. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, multicéntrico nacional (30 centros) de pacientes trasplantados de riñón con COVID19 desde el 01/02/20 al 31/12/20. Se recogieron las variables de la historia clínica y se incluyeron en una base de datos anonimizada. Se utilizó el programa estadístico SPSS para el análisis de resultados. Resultados: Se incluyeron 615 trasplantados renales con COVID19 (62.6% varones), con una edad media de 57.5 años. El tratamiento inmunosupresor predominante antes del COVID19 era la triple terapia con prednisona, tacrolimus y ácido micofenólico (54.6%) seguido de los regímenes con inbidores m-TOR (18.6%). Tras el diagnóstico de la infección se suspendió el ácido micofenólico en el 73.8% de los pacientes, el inhibidor m-TOR en el 41.4%, tacrolimus en el 10.5% y ciclosporina A en el 10%. A su vez, el 26.9% recibieron dexametasona y al 50.9% se les inició o aumentó la dosis de prednisona basal. La creatinina media antes del diagnóstico de COVID19, en el momento del diagnóstico y a los 6 meses fue de: 1,7±0,8;2.1±1.2 y 1,8±1 mg/dl respectivamente (p<0,001). Al 56.9% de los pacientes (N=350) se les monitorizó los anticuerpos anti-HLA. El 94% (N=329) no presentaron cambios en los anti-HLA, mientras que el 6% (N=21) los positivizaron. De entre los pacientes con anticuerpos donante-específicos post-COVID19 (N=9), a 7 pacientes (3,1%) se les había suspendido un inmunosupresor (en cinco de ellos se suspendió ácido micofenólico y en 2 tacrolimus), a 1 paciente los 2 inmunosupresores (3,4%) y al otro paciente no se le había modificado la inmunosupresión (1,1%), siendo estas diferencias no significativas. Conclusiones: El manejo de la inmunosupresión tras el diagnóstico de COVID19 se basó fundamentalmente en la suspensión de ácido micofenólico con reducciones o suspensiones muy discretas de inhibidores de calcineurina. Este manejo de la inmunosupresión no influyó en la función renal ni en cambios de los anticuerpos anti-HLA a los 6 meses del diagnóstico.

Negative immune responses to two-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in renal allograft recipients assessed with simple antibody and interferon gamma release assay cellular monitoring.

Studies are urgently needed to characterize immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccines in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, excluded from major clinical trials. Complex ELISPOT and other cellular response techniques have been applied, but simpler tools are needed. An easy-to-use real-world monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies against the Spike protein and QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 IFNγ release assay (IGRA) were performed at baseline and 28 days after the second dose in KT recipients and controls (dialysis patients and healthy ones). All healthy controls and >95% dialysis controls became positive for anti-S IgG antibodies, while only 63.3% of KT patients seroconverted with a very low antibody level. A positive IGRA was documented in 96.9% of controls, 89.3% peritoneal dialysis, 77.6% hemodialysis, 61.3% of KT patients transplanted more than 1 year ago and only 36% of those transplanted within the previous 12 months. Overall, 100% of healthy controls, 95.4% of dialysis patients and 78.8% KT recipients developed any immune response (humoral and/or cellular) against SARS-CoV-2. KT patients showed low rates of immune responses to mRNA Coronavirus infectious disease 2019 vaccines, especially those with recent transplantations. Simple humoral and cellular monitoring is advisable, so that repeated doses may be scheduled according to the results.

COVID-19 in Grade 4-5 Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases the risk of mortality during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) episodes, and some reports have underlined the high incidence and severity of this infection in dialysis patients. Information on COVID-19 in nondialysis CKD patients is not available yet. CASE REPORTS: Here we present 7 patients with grade 4-5 CKD who developed symptomatic COVID-19; they comprise 2.6% of our 267 advanced CKD patients. The estimated GFR was between 12 and 20 mL/min during the month prior to COVID-19. The 3 major symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnea, and 5 patients showed bilateral pneumonia. Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ceftriaxone, and steroids were the most frequently prescribed drugs. Two patients needed noninvasive mechanical ventilation. All patients showed minimal to moderate kidney function deterioration during admission, with an eGFR decline below 5 mL/min in 6 cases. No patient required acute dialysis. Six patients were discharged alive and remained dialysis free athe t the time of reporting, and one 76-year-old patient died. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 affects grade 4-5 CKD patients, but prognosis may be acceptable if prompt supportive measures are applied. These findings should be confirmed in larger cohorts, and further observations will be needed to understand the full spectrum of clinical features and the optimal approach to COVID-19 in patients with advanced CKD.

Clinical Profiles in Renal Patients with COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to frequent referrals to the emergency department on suspicion of this infection in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and kidney transplant (KT) patients. We aimed to describe their clinical features comparing confirmed and suspected non-confirmed COVID-19 cases during the Spanish epidemic peak. Confirmed COVID-19 ((+)COVID-19) corresponds to patient with positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 assay. Non-confirmed COVID-19 ((-)COVID-19) corresponds to patients with negative RT-PCR. COVID-19 was suspected in 61 patients (40/803 KT (4.9%), 21/220 MHD (9.5%)). Prevalence of (+)COVID-19 was 3.2% in KT and 3.6% in MHD patients. Thirty-four (26 KT and 8 MHD) were (+)COVID-19 and 27 (14 KT and 13 MHD) (-)COVID-19. In comparison with (-)COVID-19 patients, (+)COVID-19 showed higher frequency of typical viral symptoms (cough, dyspnea, asthenia and myalgias), pneumonia (88.2% vs. 14.3%) and LDH and CRP while lower phosphate levels, need of hospital admission (100% vs. 63%), use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (36% vs. 11%) and mortality (38% vs. 0%) (p < 0.001). Time from symptoms onset to admission was longer in patients who finally died than in survivors (8.5 vs. 3.8, p = 0.007). In KT and MHD patients, (+)COVID-19 shows more clinical severity than suspected non-confirmed cases. Prompt RT-PCR is mandatory to confirm COVID-19 diagnosis.

Use of tocilizumab in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus infection is related to a cytokine storm with large interleukin-6 (IL-6) release. The IL-6-receptor blocker tocilizumab may control the aberrant host immune response in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) . In this pandemic, kidney transplant (KT) recipients are a high-risk population for severe infection and showed poor outcomes. We present a multicenter cohort study of 80 KT patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab during hospital admission. High mortality rate was identified (32.5%), related with older age (hazard ratio [HR] 3.12 for those older than 60 years, P = .039). IL-6 and other inflammatory markers, including lactic acid dehydrogenase, ferritin, and D-dimer increased early after tocilizumab administration and their values were higher in nonsurvivors. Instead, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased after tocilizumab, and this decrease positively correlated with survival (mean 12.3 mg/L in survivors vs. 33 mg/L in nonsurvivors). Each mg/L of CRP soon after tocilizumab increased the risk of death by 1% (HR 1.01 [confidence interval 1.004-1.024], P = .003). Although patients who died presented with worse respiratory situation at admission, this was not significantly different at tocilizumab administration and did not have an impact on outcome in the multivariate analysis. Tocilizumab may be effective in controlling cytokine storm in COVID-19 but randomized trials are needed.

COVID-19 in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

The SARS-Cov-2 infection disease (COVID-19) pandemic has posed at risk the kidney transplant (KT) population, particularly the elderly recipients. From March 12 until April 4, 2020, we diagnosed COVID-19 in 16 of our 324 KT patients aged ≥65 years old (4.9%). Many of them had had contact with healthcare facilities in the month prior to infection. Median time of symptom onset to admission was 7 days. All presented with fever and all but one with pneumonia. Up to 33% showed renal graft dysfunction. At infection diagnosis, mTOR inhibitors or mycophenolate were withdrawn. Tacrolimus was withdrawn in 70%. The main treatment combination was hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. A subset of patients was treated with anti-retroviral and tocilizumab. Short-term fatality rate was 50% at a median time since admission of 3 days. Those who died were more frequently obese, frail, and had underlying heart disease. Although a higher respiratory rate was observed at admission in nonsurvivors, symptoms at presentation were similar between both groups. Patients who died were more anemic, lymphopenic, and showed higher D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and IL-6 at their first tests. COVID-19 is frequent among the elderly KT population and associates a very early and high mortality rate.